|Distinct Indiscernibles and the Bundle Theory|
|Source: Mind, New Series, Vol. 106, No. 422 (Apr., 1997), pp. 305-309|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper||Disclaimer|
Philosophers Index Abstract
In this dialogue – a minor sequel to Max Black's classic, "The Identity of Indiscernibles1," Mind 61 (19522), – interlocutor A defends the bundle theory from B's objection that it renders impossible an evidently possible state of affairs: namely, that there be a symmetrical universe, such as Black's world consisting of nothing but two indiscernible spheres. A's strategy is that of John O'Leary-Hawthorne, "The Bundle Theory of Substance and the Identity of Indiscernibles3," Analysis 55 (19954). B argues that, although A may have made room for symmetrical worlds, there are other evident possibilities ruled out by the bundle theory.
See "Zimmerman (Dean) - Distinct Indiscernibles and the Bundle Theory" for an expanded version.
Footnote 2: See "Black (Max) - The Identity of Indiscernibles".
Footnote 4: See "O'Leary-Hawthorne (John) - The Bundle Theory of Substance and the Identity of Indiscernibles".
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2018.||Please address any comments on this page to firstname.lastname@example.org.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|