|The Pluralizability Objection to a New-Body Afterlife|
|Drange (Theodore M.)|
|Source: Martin & Augustine - The Myth of an Afterlife, Part 2, Chapter 18|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Notes Citing this Paper||Disclaimer|
This paper presents and defends that an afterlife2 in which a person receives a new body after his or her old body is destroyed (as it is on some notions of bodily resurrection) is conceptually impossible. The main idea behind this argument is that such an afterlife3 would conceptually require that a person be a kind of thing that could be rendered plural. But since persons are not that type of thing, such an afterlife4 is not conceptually possible.
Footnote 1: Taken from Link.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2019.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|