On Parfit's View That We Are Not Human Beings
Olson (Eric)
Source: O'Hear (Anthony), Ed. - Mind, Self and Person, 2015: 39-56
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Author’s Abstract

  1. Derek Parfit1 claims that we are not human beings. Rather, each of us is the part of a human being that thinks in the strictest sense. This is said to solve a number of difficult metaphysical problems.
  2. I argue that the view has metaphysical problems of its own, and is inconsistent with any psychological-continuity account of personal identity over time, including Parfit2's own.

Sections
  1. The Narrow Criterion
  2. Peculiarities of the Narrow Criterion
  3. Why Parfit3 Thinks We’re Not Human Beings
  4. The Embedded-part View
  5. Thinking-subject Minimalism
  6. The Embodied-part View and Identity Over Time
  7. Functioning Brains
  8. Alternatives

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page