The Role of the Brainstem in Personal Identity
Olson (Eric)
Source: A. Blank, ed., Animals: New Essays, Philosophia 2016: 291-302
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryNotes Citing this Paper


Author’s Abstract

  1. The main claims of "Olson (Eric) - The Human Animal - Personal Identity Without Psychology" were that we are animals, and that our persistence therefore consists not in psychological continuity but in the continuation of our biological lives.
  2. I said further that a human life was possible only if there was a functioning brainstem. Rina Tzinman and Alan Shewmon have challenged this further claim.
  3. I concede that it is probably false, but argue that this does not affect the main claims. It may, however, give rise to a new sort of fission case.

Comment:

See Web Link.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2017
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - September 2017. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page