No End in Sight: Causal Loops in Philosophy, Physics and Fiction
Hanley (Richard)
Source: Synthese, Vol. 141, No. 1 (Jul., 2004), pp. 123-152
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. There have been many objections to the possibility of time travel1. But all the truly interesting ones concern the possibility of reverse causation2. What is objectionable about reverse causation3?
  2. I diagnose that the truly interesting objections are to a further possibility: that of causal loops. I raise doubts about whether there must be causal loops if reverse causation4 obtains; but devote the majority of the paper to describing, and dispelling concerns about, various kinds of causal loop.
  3. In short, I argue that they are neither logically nor physically impossible. The only possibly objectionable feature that all causal loops share is that coincidence is required to explain them. Just how coincidental a loop will be varies: some are really quite ordinary, and some are incredibly unlikely.
  4. I end by speculating that the tendency amongst physicists to avoid discussion of causal loops involving intentional action may have been unfortunate, since intentional action is an excellent way to non-mysteriously bring about what otherwise would have been an unlikely coincidence. Hence causal loops may be more likely in a world with beings like us, than in one without.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page