Soulless Organisms? Hylomorphism vs. Animalism
Hershenov (David)
Source: American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Forthcoming
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Author’s Introduction

  1. Should an advocate of animalism1 instead endorse hylomorphism or would it be best for a hylomorphist to switch his support to animalism2? More precisely, are the considerations in favor of animalism3 more successfully met, and its drawbacks better avoided, by adopting a hylomorphic position, or does a Thomistic thinker have reasons to undergo a “metaphysical conversion” and emerge proselytizing for a Catholic animalism4?
  2. We’ll look for answers by comparing the Angelic Doctor’s account of personal identity to that of the Patron Saint of Animalism5, Eric Olson.
  3. Alas, the comparison will be incomplete due to the vast number of points of contention. Nevertheless, I hope to make some headway and provide some results that will be rather startling.


For the full text, see Hershenov - Soulless Organisms? Hylomorphism vs. Animalism.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page