Comments on Hubert L. Dreyfus 'Intelligence without representation'
Baker (Lynne Rudder)
Source: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 411-412, 2002
Paper - Abstract

Paper Summary


Author’s Introduction

  1. My main reaction to "Intelligence without representation" is to applaud. Dreyfus' s use of Merleau-Ponty is a refreshing new breeze in philosophy of psychology.
  2. About twenty or so years ago, philosophers struck an unfortunate course dictated by a pair of dubious assumptions:
    1. that ordinary psychological attributions were at risk unless vindicated by some science; and
    2. that the only possible scientific vindication required that intentional content be represented in the brain.
  3. Thus did representationalism become, in Jerry Fodor's memorable phrase, "the only game in town." As John Haugeland pointed out early on, skills (and moods) do not fit easily into the representationalist scheme.
  4. Happily, Dreyfus's paper goes a considerable way toward an alternative approach to mind.

Comment:

See Link.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - April 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page