Purgatory
Hershenov (David) & Koch-Hershenov (Rose J.)
Source: Palgrave McMillan Handbook on the Afterlife. Eds Benjamin Matheson and Yujin Nagasana. Forthcoming.
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryText Colour-Conventions


Authors’ Abstract

  1. Purgatory raises many interesting metaphysical, moral, and doctrinal issues. It has historically been a major point of contention between Christian denominations. Purgatory is most identified with the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church and contemporary Catholic philosophers typically construe the ante-mortem person and the disembodied1 soul in the hylomorphic framework of Aquinas.
  2. We’ll very briefly explore the origins on the doctrine of Purgatory, its biblical sources, Protestant rejection, and some ecumenical reconciliation.
  3. Then we’ll focus on the moral and metaphysical puzzles that Purgatory creates. We’ll concentrate upon the philosophical divisions between survivalist and corruptionist accounts of Purgatory. Both camps assume a hylomorphic framework.
    1. The survivalists believe the deceased person can persist in Purgatory prior to the resurrection with the soul as his only part.
    2. The corruptionists believe it is not the deceased person but just his soul that resides in Purgatory.
  4. Corruptionists face certain moral obstacles if the entity purged won’t be the agent of the earlier misconduct. Both sides must confront major metaphysical hurdles explaining the relationship of the soul to the person given that the posthumous soul contributes to thought in a manner quite different than it did when embodied.

Comment:

See Link.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page