Constitution and the Falling Elevator: The Continuing Incompatibility of Materialism and Resurrection Belief
Loose (Jonathan)
Source: Philosophia Christi Vol. 14, No. 2 ©2012
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Author’s Abstract

  1. Ontological dualism is energetically resisted by a range of Christian scholars including philosophers such as Baker and Corcoran who defend accounts of human persons based on material constitution.
  2. Whilst Baker’s view fails to account for diachronic identity, Corcoran’s account of life after death1 makes use of Zimmerman’s problematic “Falling Elevator Model.”
  3. It is argued that Zimmerman’s recent reassessment of the model overestimates its value for materialists2. In fact, the model generates either a fatal encounter with the nature of identity, or absurdity.
  4. A lack of alternatives is illustrated by anti-criterialist proposals. Thus it seems materialism3 and resurrection belief remain incompatible.

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2025
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2025. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page