Review - "The Fabric of Reality" by David Deutsch
Price (Huw)
Source: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 50, No. 2 (Jun., 1999), pp. 309-312
Paper - Abstract

Paper SummaryBooks / Papers Citing this PaperText Colour-Conventions

Author’s Introduction

  1. Deutsch (David) is an Oxford theoretical physicist. He is best known as one of the pioneers of 'quantum computing', which seeks to exploit the peculiarities of 'quantum interference' to perform – in principle, and perhaps in practice – computations which could not be performed by classical means. However, Deutsch's interests extend well beyond his home field.
  2. In The Fabric of Reality he defends radical conclusions about matters seemingly far removed from his home discipline. Given the ambitious, trans-disciplinary nature of Deutsch's project, and the fact that his book is aimed at the popular science market, the obvious comparison is with his Oxford colleague, Penrose (Roger). Deutsch aims even higher than Penrose, however. Where Penrose argues for a novel connection between three of the hard problems of contemporary science (quantum mechanics, gravity, and consciousness), Deutsch goes one better, and offers us a fourfold synthesis: quantum mechanics, computation, evolution, and Popperian epistemology.
  3. Thus Deutsch has set himself a very ambitious target. Too ambitious, in my view, for the effects of magnification are just what one might expect: details get lost, cracks get larger, and key points go out of focus. And where there is room for doubt, Deutsch has an annoying tendency to err on the side of confidence. So for philosophical readers familiar with Penrose's clear and carefully argued books, The Fabric of Reality is likely to be a disappointment.
  4. One example1: Deutsch maintains that quantum interference effects can only be explained by the many worlds view …

Author’s Conclusion
  1. In sum, Deutsch gives his readers a good sense of why he and many other physicists find the physical evidence for the many worlds view to be compel ling. But he fails to show that the evidence should still seem compelling, in the light of a more careful examination of the underlying argument.
  2. That task requires a nose for fine distinctions and a respect for logical rigour and clarity, and these are not the talents on display in The Fabric of Reality.

In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 1:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2017
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - September 2017. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page