Personhood and Future Belief: Two Arguments for Something like Reflection
Evnine (Simon J.)
Source: Erkenntnis (1975-), Vol. 67, No. 1 (Jul., 2007), pp. 91-110
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. This paper offers two new arguments for a version of Reflection, the principle that says, roughly, that if one knew now what one would believe in the future, one ought to believe it now.
  2. The most prominent existing argument for the principle is the coherence-based Dutch Strategy argument advanced by Bas Van Fraassen (and others). My two arguments are quite different.
    1. The first is a truth based argument. On the basis of two substantive premises, that people's beliefs generally get better over time and that being a person requires having knowledge of this fact, it concludes that it is rational to treat your future selves as experts.
    2. The second argument is a transcendental one. Being a person requires being able to engage in plans and projects. But these cannot be meaningfully undertaken unless one has Reflection-like expectations about one's future beliefs. Hence, satisfaction of Reflection is necessary for being a person.
  3. Together, the arguments show that satisfaction of Reflection is both rational and necessary for persons.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Sept 2018. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page