Theories of Theories: A View from Cognitive Science
Grandy (Richard)
Source: Earman (John), Ed. - Inference, Explanation and Other Philosophical Frustrations
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Editor’s Introduction1

  1. What was once the "received view" of scientific theories, which emphasized the representation of scientific theories as a logically closed set of sentences (usually in a first-order language), has given way to a "semantic" or "structuralist" view, expounded in different versions by Patrick Suppes, Joseph D. Sneed, Fredrick Suppe, Bas Van Fraassen, and others. But what exactly is the difference between these two ways of understanding theories? And what exactly was wrong with or lacking in the older view?
  2. In his contribution Richard Grandy argues that the proponents of the semantic view are offering not so much a new account of theories per se as a new account of the epistemology and application of theories.

Comment:

Part II - Thories and Explanations



In-Page Footnotes

Footnote 1: Taken from "Earman (John) - Inference, Explanation and Other Philosophical Frustrations: Introduction".


Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2018
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2018. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page