A Prolegomenon to Meinongian Semantics
Parsons (Terence)
Source: Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 71, No. 16 (Sep. 19, 1974), pp. 561-580
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. It is strange . . . that Meinong's object-theory should have been regarded by some as a bewildering and tangled 'jungle', it resembles rather an old formal garden containing some beautiful and difficult mazes. . . . Meinong's round square could be stitched, with complete seamlessness, into the fabric of Carnap's Meaning and Necessity,
    → J. N. Findlay
  2. In section I of this paper I will describe Meinong's jungle. In section II I will attempt to reconstruct it as a formal garden. And in section III will try to place it within the tradition of semantics to which Carnap's Meaning and Necessity belongs.
  3. I make the following claim to historical accuracy: although I don't know what Meinong meant, if I had said what I know him to have said, I would have meant the following.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page