|Intentionality as the Mark of the Dispositional|
|Source: Dialectica, Vol. 50, No. 2 (1996), pp. 91-120|
|Paper - Abstract|
|Paper Statistics||Books / Papers Citing this Paper||Colour-Conventions||Disclaimer|
→ "Searle (John) - Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind"'s (1983) directedness and
→ "Anscombe (G.E.M.) - The Intentionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature"’s (1965) indeterminacy,
are features which distinguish T-intenTional / dispositional states, both mental and non-mental (physical), from non-dispositional "categorical" states.
→ Chisholm's (1957) permissible falsity of a prepositional attitude ascription,
a feature of linguistic utterances too restricted in its scope to be of interest, or, as in the case of
→ Frege's (1892) indirect reference / Quine's (1953) referential opacity,
evidence that the S-intenSional locution is a quotation either of what someone has said in the past or might be expected to say, if the question were to arise at some time in the future.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2019.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|