Speaking of Fictional Characters
Thomasson (Amie L.)
Source: Dialectica, Vol. 57, No. 2, Special Issue: Do Ficta Follow Fiction? (2003), pp. 205-223
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. The challenge of handling fictional discourse is to find the best way to resolve the apparent inconsistencies in our ways of speaking about fiction.
  2. A promising approach is to take at least some such discourse to involve pretense, but does all fictional discourse involve pretense?
  3. I will argue that a better, less revisionary, solution is to take internal and fictionalizing discourse to involve pretense, while allowing that in external critical discourse, fictional names are used seriously to refer to fictional characters.
  4. I then address two objections to such realist theories of fiction:
    1. One, that they can't adequately account for the truth of singular nonexistence claims involving fictional names, and
    2. Two, that accepting that there are fictional characters to which we refer is implausible or ontologically profligate.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page