Epicureans and the Present Past
Warren (James)
Source: Phronesis, Vol. 51, No. 4 (2006), pp. 362-387
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Author’s Abstract

  1. This essay offers a reading of a difficult passage in the first book of Lucretius' De Rerum Natura in which the poet first explains the Epicurean account of time and then responds to a worry about the status of the past (1.459-82). It identifies two possible readings of the passage, one of which is compatible with the claim that the Epicureans were presentists about the past.
  2. Other evidence, particularly from Cicero De Fato, suggests that the Epicureans maintained that all true assertions must have a contemporaneous truth-maker and that no contingent future tensed assertions are true. It appears, however, that they did not assert a symmetrical view of past-tensed assertions.
  3. There is no compelling reason, therefore, to think that the Epicureans were presentists about the past.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page