The ungrounded argument is unfounded: a response to Mumford
Williams (Neil Edward)
Source: Synthese, Vol. 170, No. 1 (Sep., 2009), pp. 7-19
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. Arguing against the claim that every dispositional property is grounded in some property other than itself, "Mumford (Stephen) - The Ungrounded Argument" presents what Mumford calls the 'Ungrounded Argument'. If successful, the Ungrounded Argument would represent a major victory for anti-Humean metaphysics over its Humean rivals, as it would allow for the existence of primitive modality.
  2. Unfortunately, Humeans need not yet be worried, as the Ungrounded Argument is itself lacking in grounding. I indicate where Mumford's argument falls down, claiming that even the dispositions of the simplest particles can have categorical bases.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page