Independence accounts of substance and substantial parts
Toner (Patrick)
Source: Philosophical Studies, Vol. 155, No. 1 (August 2011), pp. 37-43
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. Traditionally, independence accounts of substance have held pride of place. Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes and Spinoza - among many others - accepted independence accounts in one form or another. The general thrust of such views is that substances are those things that are apt to exist in themselves.
  2. In this paper, I argue that several contemporary independence theories of substance - including those of Kit Fine, E.J. Lowe and Michael Gorman - include an ad hoc element that renders them unacceptable.
  3. I'll also consider the theories of Joshua Hoffman and Gary Rosenkrantz.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Nov 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page