Paul Seabright: pluralism and the standard of living
Parfit (Derek)
Source: Martha Nussbaum & Amartya Sen (eds.) The quality of life, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 410-417
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Editor’s Abstract

  1. Parfit first takes on Paul Seabright's contractualist assumption (‘Nothing is society's business unless it could be the subject of an appropriate hypothetical social contract’) and questions Seabright's view about what could be covered by such a hypothetical agreement.
  2. Parfit then attacks Seabright's method of assessing the value of various goods and services.
  3. Finally, Parfit exposes the ambiguity in Seabright's appeal to pluralism.

Comment:

For the full text, see Parfit - Paul Seabright: pluralism and the standard of living.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - July 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page