Correspondence - 2
Parfit (Derek) & Fried (Charles)
Source: Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 8, no. 4 (Summer, 1979), pp. 395-397
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsColour-ConventionsDisclaimer


Fried’s Introduction

  1. There is a domain in which arguments of the sort advanced in "Taurek (John M.) - Should the Numbers Count?" are proof against the criticism offered by "Parfit (Derek) - Innumerate ethics".
  2. Parfit is willing to recognize that it is rational and moral to save my own arm-or the arm of my friend or family member-rather than the life of a stranger. Presumably Parfit also agrees that it is rational to choose a course of conduct which would mean saving my own life-or that of a friend or family member-rather than saving the lives of five strangers. What he disagrees with is the proposition that it could be moral to save the life of one person rather than the lives of five when all six are equally strangers to me and there are no other relevant distinctions between the two choices, such as the fact that saving the five is more costly or more hazardous.

Parfit’s Introduction
Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page