Review of Mark Rowlands' 'The New Science of the Mind'
Madary (Michael)
Source: The Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (Winter 2011)
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsColour-ConventionsDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. Review of The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology by Mark Rowlands.
  2. One of the latest labels to emerge for anti­classical (or non­Cartesian, or post­cognitivist) cognitive science is '4E.' The four Es here are the Embodied, Embedded, Enacted, and Extended approaches to cognition. Since there are a number of different, and likely incompatible, lines of thought within the 4E group, more work needs to be done to articulate how the Es can and should fit together.
  3. Mark Rowlands' newest book addresses this need in a valuable way. He argues, clearly and carefully, for the thesis of the amalgamated mind, which "subsumes both theses of the embodied and the extended mind" (84).
  4. The thesis of the embedded mind is rejected as being merely a claim about cognition depending causally on the environment. As such, it is not strong enough to be interesting for Rowlands' non­Cartesian project.
  5. The thesis of the enacted mind, in particular Alva Noe's sensorimotor version of it, is also rejected as being either implausible or no stronger than the thesis of the embedded mind (81 & 82).
  6. First I will outline Rowlands' defense of the thesis of the amalgamated mind, then I will raise some issues for further investigation.


For the full text of the penultimate draft, see Madary - Review of Mark Rowlands' 'The New Science of the Mind'.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page