How to Combine and Not to Combine Physics and Metaphysics
Dorato (Mauro)
Source: V. Karakostas and D. Dieks (eds.), Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings 2, Springer 2013
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Author’s Conclusion

  1. In this paper I will argue that if physics is to become a coherent metaphysics of nature it needs an “interpretation”.
  2. As I understand it, an interpretation of a physical theory amounts to offering
    1. a precise formulation of its ontological claims and
    2. a clear account of how such claims are related to the world of our experience.
  3. Notably, metaphysics enters importantly in both tasks: in (i), because interpreting our best physical theories requires going beyond a merely instrumentalist view of science; in (ii), because a philosophical elaboration of the theories of the world that are implicit in our experience is one of the tasks of analytic metaphysics, and bridging possible explanatory gaps or even conflicts between the physical image and the manifest image of the world (Sellars1962),which is a typical philosophical task that involves both science and metaphysics.


Downloaded from, 7th July 2019

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2019. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page