Too Many Persons, or None At All?
Maurer (Nicholas)
Source: Academia.edu
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Author’s Introduction

  1. In his paper "Duncan (Matt) - I Think, Therefore I Persist", Matt Duncan argues that the familiar acts of thought and perception imply the existence of persons.
  2. I shall first provide both a brief explanation of this position and the arguments with which he supports it. I shall then make my response, which will be twofold.
    1. First, I argue that as presented, Duncan’s view is at best undesirable, and at worst absurd, for it implies that one’s life is constituted by many distinct persons — each coming into and falling out of existence with every corresponding thought or perception.
    2. Second, I claim that Duncan in fact assumes that which he desires to prove and, by so doing, hasn’t secured the existence of persons at all.
  3. I conclude with a couple of brief remarks concerning this latter claim and whether it has any further implications.

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page