- In his paper "Duncan (Matt) - I Think, Therefore I Persist", Matt Duncan argues that the familiar acts of thought and perception imply the existence of persons.
- I shall first provide both a brief explanation of this position and the arguments with which he supports it. I shall then make my response, which will be twofold.
- First, I argue that as presented, Duncan’s view is at best undesirable, and at worst absurd, for it implies that one’s life is constituted by many distinct persons — each coming into and falling out of existence with every corresponding thought or perception.
- Second, I claim that Duncan in fact assumes that which he desires to prove and, by so doing, hasn’t secured the existence of persons at all.
- I conclude with a couple of brief remarks concerning this latter claim and whether it has any further implications.
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
- Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)