How To Understand The Debate Over Presentism And Eternalism
Figg (Travis Matthew)
Source: Doctoral Dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, 2017
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Author’s Abstract

  1. Presentism is the view that, with the possible exception of things outside of time, everything that exists, exists at the present time. It is contrasted with eternalism, the view that everything which ever did exist or ever will exist, exists.
  2. Some philosophers argue that presentism and eternalism are not really substantive, opposed metaphysical theses.
  3. I consider some attempts in the literature to rebut this skeptical position, and argue that they are unsatisfactory.
  4. Then I make my own case for the conclusion that presentism and eternalism are substantive metaphysical theses by drawing a distinction between two ways of talking about what exists with respect to a time, and imagining a hypothetical analogous debate about the nature of space.

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page