Questions about 'Internal and External Questions about God'
Deng (Natalja)
Source: Religious Studies 48/2: 257-268, June 2012
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Author’s Abstract

  1. This article is an evaluation of Robin LePoidevin's use of Carnap's stance on ontology within the philosophy of religion.
  2. Le Poidevin claims that
    1. Theists need to take God to be a putative entity within space-time in order for their claim that God exists to be meaningful, and that
    2. Instrumentalism about theology is viable.
  3. I argue that although Le Poidevin's response to Carnap's argument is no less problematic than that argument itself, his position is in fact thoroughly un-Carnapian.
  4. The upshot is that his discussion provides some support to atheism, but none to either of his two official conclusions.

Comment:

Downloaded from academia.edu, 15th September 2019

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Oct 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page