Beyond Falsifiability: Normal Science in a Multiverse
Carroll (Sean M.)
Source: Invited contribution to Epistemology of Fundamental Physics: Why Trust a Theory?, eds. R. Dawid, R. Dardashti, and K. Thebault (CUP, January 17, 2018)
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer

Author’s Abstract

  1. Cosmological models that invoke a multiverse – a collection of unobservable regions of space where conditions are very different from the region around us – are controversial, on the grounds that unobservable phenomena shouldn’t play a crucial role in legitimate scientific theories.
  2. I argue that the way we evaluate multiverse models is precisely the same as the way we evaluate any other models, on the basis of abduction, Bayesian inference, and empirical success.
  3. There is no scientifically respectable way to do cosmology without taking into account different possibilities for what the universe might be like outside our horizon.
  4. Multiverse theories are utterly conventionally scientific, even if evaluating them can be difficult in practice.


For the full text, see Carroll - Beyond Falsifiability: Normal Science in a Multiverse.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2020. Please address any comments on this page to File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page