Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
Bastian (Brock), Etc.
Source: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, XX(X) 1–10, 2011
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsDisclaimer


Authors’ Abstract

  1. Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds.
  2. The current three studies show that this dissonance motivates people to deny minds to animals.
    1. Study 1 demonstrates that animals considered appropriate for human consumption are ascribed diminished mental capacities.
    2. Study 2 shows that meat eaters are motivated to deny minds to food animals when they are reminded of the link between meat and animal suffering.
    3. Finally, Study 3 provides direct support for our dissonance hypothesis, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial. Moreover, this mind denial in turn reduces negative affect associated with dissonance.
  3. The findings highlight the role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments.

Comment:

Downloaded from Semantics Scholar, 7th July 2020

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2020
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2020. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page