Progress and Degeneration in the 'IQ Debate': Comments on Urbach
Tizard (Jack)
Source: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp. 251-258
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Structure

  1. Hard Core or Fisher.
  2. The Heritability of Intelligence.
  3. Critique of Urbach.
  4. Measuring the Environment.
  5. Sub-Population Differences.
  6. Between Groups Heritability in Stature.

Introduction
  1. In a recent paper Peter Urbach ([1974]) discusses what he calls progress and degeneration in the IQ debate. Urbach's paper contains in my judgment errors of fact, errors in the interpretation of data, and conceptual misunderstandings.
  2. I should like to comment on these, first stating my own position on the general issue. It is this: the controversy about heritability of IQ, in particular as it relates to social class and other sub-population differences, is scientifically barren, because the questions are posed in such a way as to admit of no definite, or even 'probabilistic' answer. The 'debate' is being conducted in thoroughly old-fashioned terms which confuse the real issues.

Comment:

Reply to:-

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2021
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2021. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page