Do the verdicts in the trial of the Colston 4 signal something wrong with our jury system? 10 things you should know
The Secret Barrister
Source: The Secret Barrister, 6 January 2022
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsNotes Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Sections

  1. What happened in this case?
  2. What is criminal damage?
  3. I thought I read that the defendants all admitted criminal damage?
  4. What is a lawful excuse for damaging property?
  5. So if the jury were sure that damage was caused and that there was no lawful excuse, they had to convict the defendants, right?
  6. So which defence did the jury accept?
  7. Why are so many people so upset?
  8. Is there a loophole in the law?
  9. Is this outcome an affront to the Rule of Law?
  10. Does this create a precedent? Does it mean that anybody can now pull down a statute of somebody they don’t like without
    consequence?

Comment:

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2022
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Jan 2022. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page