Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
Hume (David), Tweyman (Stanley), Ed.
This Page provides (where held) the Abstract of the above Book and those of all the Papers contained in it.
Colour-ConventionsDisclaimerBooks / Papers Citing this BookNotes Citing this Book

Authors Citing this Book: Harrison (Jonathan)


BOOK ABSTRACT:

Back Cover Blurb

  1. Based on the original handwritten manuscript, this book provides a new, accurate edition of Hume's important work, faithful to his original text, marginal notes, and changes, Stanley Tweyman's comprehensive introduction gives an interpretation of the Dialogues as a whole, as well as close analysis of each of the work's twelve parts.
  2. Hume's views on evil are discussed in four previously published articles, and the volume concludes with an extensive bibliography.
  3. Stanley Tweyman is Professor of Philosophy at York University, Toronto.

BOOK COMMENT:
  • Routledge, London, 1991, Paperback
  • Also an e-Book downloaded from Project Gutenberg



"Tweyman (Stanley) - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: Preface & Introduction"

Source: Hume, Tweyman - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion


Preface (Full Text, truncated)
  1. This edition of David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion attempts to provide an accurate reproduction of the handwritten manuscript housed in the National Library in Edinburgh.
  2. With the exception of minor grammatical changes, (e.g. "tis' to ‘it Is’, 'which' to 'that'), all Hume's revisions are included. Hume's editorial changes are indicated in the text by the use of footnotes, and, in the case of word or phrase substitutions, both the deleted and the added text are given. Major additions to the text are noted by the use of two asterisks at the beginning and end of the added passage, and by a footnote giving Hume's directions for insertion. Hume's own footnotes are printed in italics. The original punctuation has been retained throughout; in most cases, though, spelling has been modernized and his general capitalization of nouns has been omitted. Hume uses Arabic numbers in his text for numbering the twelve Parts, and this style has been retained in this edition in the text of the Dialogues and in the Introduction.
  3. The Introduction contains an interpretation of the Dialogues which I first began developing in a number of published papers, and in my Scepticism and Belief in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1986). The current study of the Dialogues differs from this earlier work in a number of significant ways. Whereas the earlier book confined itself to a detailed analysis of Parts 1 through 8 and 12 (Cleanthes' Argument from Design and Philo's criticisms of this argument), this Introduction provides an analysis of all twelve parts of the Dialogues. Furthermore, whereas Scepticism and Belief attempted to relate the Dialogues to Hume's treatment of natural belief in the Treatise of Human Nature and to his discussion of 'scepticism' in the Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, the current study omits entirely the treatment of natural belief, and deals only briefly with the material in the first Enquiry on scepticism. I continue to believe in the importance of the ‘natural belief’ doctrine in the Treatise and of Hume's analysis of sceptism in the first Enquiry to a full understanding of Parts 1 through 8 and 12 of the Dialogues. However, since I have previously recorded my thoughts on these matters, I can only recommend that the reader consult my Scepticism and Belief for a more detailed account than I am able to offer here of Hume's treatment of Cleanthes' Argument from Design. Kluwer has been highly supportive of my work on Hume: I would like to thank the publishers tor their encouragement in regard to this edition of the Dialogues.
  4. In addition to the text of the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and an Introduction, this volume contains a number of articles which should assist the reader in understanding the debate in the Dialogues. These papers were originally presented as a symposium at the Edinburgh Hume Conference, 25-30 August 1986, and subsequently appeared in Hume Studies, 13, 1987. An extensive bibliography is also included.



"Hume (David) - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion"

Source: Hume, Tweyman - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion



"Tweyman (Stanley) - Hume's Dialogues On Evil"

Source: Hume, Tweyman - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

COMMENT: For responses, see:-



"Davis (John W.) - Going Out The Window: A Comment On Tweyman"

Source: Hume, Tweyman - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

COMMENT: Response to "Tweyman (Stanley) - Hume's Dialogues On Evil".



"Nathan (George) - Comments On Tweyman And Davis"

Source: Hume, Tweyman - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

COMMENT: Response to:-



"Wadia (P. S.) - Commentary On Professor Tweyman's 'Hume On Evil'"

Source: Hume, Tweyman - Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

COMMENT: Response to "Tweyman (Stanley) - Hume's Dialogues On Evil".



Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - August 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page