Amazon Book Description
- A runaway train is racing toward five men who are tied to the track. Unless the train is stopped, it will inevitably kill all five men. You are standing on a footbridge looking down on the unfolding disaster. However, a fat man, a stranger, is standing next to you: if you push him off the bridge, he will topple onto the line and, although he will die, his chunky body will stop the train, saving five lives. Would you kill the fat man?
- The question may seem bizarre. But it's one variation of a puzzle that has baffled moral philosophers for almost half a century and that more recently has come to preoccupy neuroscientists, psychologists, and other thinkers as well.
- In this book, David Edmonds, coauthor of the best-selling "Edmonds (David) & Eidinow (John) - Wittgenstein's Poker", tells the riveting story of why and how philosophers have struggled with this ethical dilemma, sometimes called the trolley problem. In the process, he provides an entertaining and informative tour through the history of moral philosophy.
- Most people feel it's wrong to kill the fat man. But why? After all, in taking one life you could save five. As Edmonds shows, answering the question is far more complex – and important – than it first appears. In fact, how we answer it tells us a great deal about right and wrong.
- "Lucid, witty, and beautifully written, this book is a pleasure to read. While providing an introduction to moral philosophy, it also presents engaging portraits of some of the greatest moral philosophers from Thomas Aquinas to the present day, and it makes the case for the relevance to ethics of the new experimental moral psychology. It is a tour de force."
→ Anthony Kwame Appiah, author of The Honor Code: How Moral Revolutions Happen (see Wikipedia: Kwame Anthony Appiah)
- "This is a splendid work. You shouldn't expect it to resolve all your trolley problems but you can look forward to a romping mix of fine humor, intriguing anecdote, and solid argument. It's a sheer joy to read."
→ Philip Pettit, Princeton University and Australian National University
- "David Edmonds has a remarkable knack for weaving the threads of philosophical debates into an engaging story. Would You Kill the Fat Man? is a stimulating introduction to some key ethical issues and philosophers."
→ Peter Singer
- "David Edmonds's new book, Would You Kill the Fat Man? , is both highly informative and a delight to read. Written in a clear, engaging, and witty style, it succeeds admirably in making various fascinating and important debates in philosophy and psychology accessible to a broad readership."
→ Jeff McMahan, Rutgers University
- "This is a highly engaging book. David Edmonds's reflections are full of insight and he provides fascinating biographical background about the main players in the history of the trolley problem, in a style reminiscent of his very successful Wittgenstein's Poker."
→ Roger Crisp, University of Oxford
Amazon Customer Review
- This was a readable survey of the famous trolley-problem - with all its many variations. Edmonds is good at explaining what the scenario was created to show and why all those intricate other versions were created. This involves, as a by-product, a bit of a survey of some of the basic trends in modern philosophy - though it does not aspire to be comprehensive or complete.
- It is entertaining because the author explains the ideas and sets them in their context, including a good account of Philippa Foot's two articles in which she announced the trolley problem and some background knowledge about her (maternal) grandfather President Cleveland and his response to the Pullman strikes of 1893.
- But mixed into all of this there is a sub-theme about the relation of these thought experiments to philosophy (Chapters 5, 10, and 15). They function as a kind of set of experiments on how we make choices: whether we respond by thinking, emotional intuition, or evolution’s adaptations to our biochemistry. The 15th chapter notes that not all philosophers think these concerns are crucial (examples include 'virtue philosophers', like Philippa Foot herself).
- He traces thought experiments back to john Locke, through Adam Smith and so on (omitting Plato - the Republic is one big thought experiment as are all attempts to think about the origins of culture and language. It might have been worth wondering why these became so fashionable from the mid-century onwards). My guess would be that it is something to do with law and the way judges use cases to refine legal principles. Law helped turn Oxford ordinary language theory away from a concern with words and phrases and back toward consideration of metaphysical topics: rationality, ethical principles and public behaviour. But I don't really know and it would be good to find out.
Book Comment
Princeton University Press; Illustrated edition (22 Feb. 2015)
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2025
- Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)