Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong
Edmonds (David)
This Page provides (where held) the Abstract of the above Book and those of all the Papers contained in it.
Text Colour-ConventionsDisclaimerPapers in this BookNotes Citing this Book



Amazon Book Description


Amazon Customer Review
  • This was a readable survey of the famous trolley-problem - with all its many variations. Edmonds is good at explaining what the scenario was created to show and why all those intricate other versions were created. This involves, as a by-product, a bit of a survey of some of the basic trends in modern philosophy - though it does not aspire to be comprehensive or complete.
  • It is entertaining because the author explains the ideas and sets them in their context, including a good account of Philippa Foot's two articles in which she announced the trolley problem and some background knowledge about her (maternal) grandfather President Cleveland and his response to the Pullman strikes of 1893.
  • But mixed into all of this there is a sub-theme about the relation of these thought experiments to philosophy (Chapters 5, 10, and 15). They function as a kind of set of experiments on how we make choices: whether we respond by thinking, emotional intuition, or evolution’s adaptations to our biochemistry. The 15th chapter notes that not all philosophers think these concerns are crucial (examples include 'virtue philosophers', like Philippa Foot herself).
  • He traces thought experiments back to john Locke, through Adam Smith and so on (omitting Plato - the Republic is one big thought experiment as are all attempts to think about the origins of culture and language. It might have been worth wondering why these became so fashionable from the mid-century onwards). My guess would be that it is something to do with law and the way judges use cases to refine legal principles. Law helped turn Oxford ordinary language theory away from a concern with words and phrases and back toward consideration of metaphysical topics: rationality, ethical principles and public behaviour. But I don't really know and it would be good to find out.

Book Comment

Princeton University Press; Illustrated edition (22 Feb. 2015)



Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2025
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - May 2025. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page