Butler Scoring - Mountnessing Butler Pairs (16/10/2014)

Event Results: Link


Overall Ranking

Rank Pair ID Pair Name Butler IMPs X-IMPs NGS %age
1 7 Roger Bacon & Len Williams 57 56.25 66.57
2 13 Simon Moorman & Peter Oake 38 35.75 59.65
3 8 Catriona Lovett & Mike Harbour 24 23.62 56.96
4 18 David Tennet & Theo Todman 10 12 53.53
5 17 Dorothy Cundy & Chris Rastin 10 6.75 51.99
6 10 Chris Megahey & Alaric Cundy 8 9.5 52.8
7 15 Pamela Kite & Liz Williams 1 -0.88 49.76
8 14 Les Curtis & David Piper 1 2.25 50.61
9 9 Margaret Rastin & Roger Tattersfield 0 0.12 50.04
10 12 Lionel Thacker & James Murray -1 -2.5 49.32
11 3 Maureen Vede & Lorraine Butler -5 -7.5 47.79
12 11 Phil Hitchins & Phil Tucker -8 -1.62 49.52
13 19 Derek Smith & Peter Goodey -15 -13.12 46.46
14 1 Maureen Robinson & Roger Hayward -15 -8.25 47.57
15 16 Julie Lake & Gillian Burrows -15 -15.62 45.78
16 4 Angela West & Bill West -15 -19.75 44.18
17 6 Sheila Vincent & Nick Hagan -22 -25.38 42.53
18 5 Jill Tattersfield & Lorna Wells -25 -25.62 42.45
19 2 Carol McCue & Terry Murphy -28 -26 42.98

Detailed Analysis


Detail for Pair: Maureen Robinson & Roger Hayward

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
1 1 NS 11 5D+1 N . 12 420 580 -160 -4 -4 -4
1 2 NS 11 4H-2 S . 8 -200 40 -240 -6 -6 -7
1 3 NS 10 4S= S . 10 420 270 150 4 4 4
1 4 NS 10 2D+1 E . 9 -110 -100 -10 0 0 0
1 5 NS 2 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -2
1 6 NS 2 2S+1 N . 9 140 100 40 1 1 2
1 9 NS 19 6NT= N . 12 990 460 530 11 11 11 Yes
1 10 NS 19 2H-1 S . 7 -100 10 -110 -3 -3 -3
1 11 NS 18 5CX-1 S . 10 -100 -290 190 5 5 4
1 12 NS 18 3C-1 S . 8 -100 10 -110 -3 -3 -3
1 13 NS 17 6NT-1 N . 11 -100 -20 -80 -2 -2 -2
1 14 NS 17 4S= N . 10 420 310 110 3 3 4
1 15 NS 16 3S= N . 9 140 0 140 4 4 4
1 16 NS 16 3H-1 E . 8 100 -150 250 6 6 6
1 17 NS 15 6H= E . 12 -980 -620 -360 -8 -8 -8
1 18 NS 15 2H+1 W . 9 -140 -120 -20 -1 -1 -1
1 19 NS 14 3C= S . 9 110 300 -190 -5 -5 -4
1 20 NS 14 3S+1 E . 10 -170 50 -220 -6 -6 -4
1 21 EW 13 3D+1 E . 10 130 120 10 0 0 2
1 22 EW 13 3S-1 E . 8 -100 60 -160 -4 -4 -3
1 23 EW 12 3H= W . 9 140 230 -90 -3 -3 -3
1 24 EW 12 3H= N . 9 -140 -110 -30 -1 -1 -1


Detail for Pair: Carol McCue & Terry Murphy

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
2 1 EW 6 3NT+1 N . 10 -430 -580 150 4 4 4
2 2 EW 6 3NT-2 S . 7 200 -40 240 6 6 7 Yes
2 3 NS 12 4S-1 S . 9 -50 270 -320 -8 -8 -7
2 4 NS 12 2NT-4 N . 4 -400 -100 -300 -7 -7 -8 Yes
2 5 EW 1 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 2
2 6 EW 1 2S+1 N . 9 -140 -100 -40 -1 -1 -2
2 7 EW 7 4S+1 S . 11 -650 -660 10 0 0 2
2 8 EW 7 4HX-2 E . 8 -300 -100 -200 -5 -5 -6 Yes
2 9 EW 18 3NT+2 S . 11 -460 -460 0 0 0 0
2 10 EW 18 2H+1 N . 9 -140 -10 -130 -4 -4 -4 Yes
2 11 EW 8 4C= S . 10 -130 290 -420 -9 -9 -9 Yes
2 12 EW 8 2H= N . 8 -110 -10 -100 -3 -3 -3
2 13 EW 3 6NT-2 N . 10 200 20 180 5 5 5
2 14 EW 3 4S= N . 10 -420 -310 -110 -3 -3 -4 Yes
2 15 EW 9 2S+2 N . 10 -170 0 -170 -5 -5 -5 Yes
2 16 EW 9 4S-2 N . 8 100 150 -50 -2 -2 -2
2 17 EW 4 4H+2 E . 12 480 620 -140 -4 -4 -3
2 18 EW 4 3H-1 W . 8 -50 120 -170 -5 -5 -5
2 19 EW 11 3NT= S . 9 -400 -300 -100 -3 -3 -3
2 20 EW 11 5D-1 N . 10 100 -50 150 4 4 3
2 21 EW 5 3D= E . 9 110 120 -10 0 0 1
2 22 EW 5 4H-4 N . 6 200 60 140 4 4 4
2 23 NS 19 3H+1 W . 10 -170 -230 60 2 2 2
2 24 NS 19 2H+3 N . 11 200 110 90 3 3 3 Yes


Detail for Pair: Maureen Vede & Lorraine Butler

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
3 1 EW 15 6D= N . 12 -920 -580 -340 -8 -8 -8
3 2 EW 15 2S+2 S . 10 -170 -40 -130 -4 -4 -3
3 3 EW 14 4S= S . 10 -420 -270 -150 -4 -4 -4
3 4 EW 14 2D= E . 8 90 100 -10 0 0 0
3 5 NS 13 3S-1 S . 8 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -2
3 6 NS 13 1NT= W . 7 -90 100 -190 -5 -5 -4
3 7 NS 12 4S+2 N . 12 680 660 20 1 1 -1
3 8 NS 12 3C+1 S . 10 130 100 30 1 1 1
3 9 NS 11 3NT+3 N . 12 490 460 30 1 1 1
3 10 NS 11 2H+1 S . 9 140 10 130 4 4 4
3 11 NS 10 5CX-1 S . 10 -100 -290 190 5 5 4
3 12 NS 10 3S-2 W . 7 100 10 90 3 3 3
3 13 NS 2 6NT-2 N . 10 -200 -20 -180 -5 -5 -5
3 14 NS 2 4S= N . 10 420 310 110 3 3 4 Yes
3 17 NS 19 4H+2 E . 12 -480 -620 140 4 4 3
3 18 NS 19 2H+2 W . 10 -170 -120 -50 -2 -2 -2
3 19 NS 18 5C-1 S . 10 -50 300 -350 -8 -8 -8
3 20 NS 18 4D= N . 10 130 50 80 2 2 2
3 21 NS 17 3D+2 W . 11 -150 -120 -30 -1 -1 -2 Yes
3 22 NS 17 4S-3 E . 7 300 -60 360 8 8 7
3 23 NS 16 3H= W . 9 -140 -230 90 3 3 3
3 24 NS 16 1NT-2 E . 5 100 110 -10 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Angela West & Bill West

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
4 1 NS 17 3NT+1 N . 10 430 580 -150 -4 -4 -4
4 2 NS 17 4S-1 S . 9 -100 40 -140 -4 -4 -4
4 3 EW 16 4D-3 E . 7 -300 -270 -30 -1 -1 -1
4 4 EW 16 2D= E . 8 90 100 -10 0 0 0
4 5 EW 15 4S-2 N . 8 200 0 200 5 5 5 Yes
4 6 EW 15 3S-1 N . 8 50 -100 150 4 4 4
4 7 NS 14 6S= S . 12 1430 660 770 13 13 13 Yes
4 8 NS 14 5D-3 N . 8 -150 100 -250 -6 -6 -6 Yes
4 9 NS 13 3NT+2 N . 11 460 460 0 0 0 0
4 10 NS 13 4H-2 S . 8 -200 10 -210 -5 -5 -5 Yes
4 11 NS 12 4H= W . 10 -420 -290 -130 -4 -4 -4
4 12 NS 12 4H-1 N . 9 -100 10 -110 -3 -3 -3
4 13 NS 11 6NT-1 S . 11 -100 -20 -80 -2 -2 -2
4 14 NS 11 4S-1 N . 9 -50 310 -360 -8 -8 -8 Yes
4 15 NS 10 2H= N . 8 110 0 110 3 3 3
4 16 NS 10 4SX-1 N . 9 -100 -150 50 2 2 2
4 17 NS 2 4H+2 E . 12 -480 -620 140 4 4 3
4 18 NS 2 3H-1 W . 8 50 -120 170 5 5 5
4 21 NS 19 3D+2 W . 11 -150 -120 -30 -1 -1 -2
4 22 NS 19 4C-4 S . 6 -200 -60 -140 -4 -4 -4
4 23 NS 18 4H= E . 10 -620 -230 -390 -9 -9 -8
4 24 NS 18 1S+1 S . 8 110 110 0 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Jill Tattersfield & Lorna Wells

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
5 1 NS 19 3NT+1 N . 10 430 580 -150 -4 -4 -4
5 2 NS 19 2S+2 S . 10 170 40 130 4 4 3
5 3 NS 18 4S= S . 10 420 270 150 4 4 4
5 4 NS 18 3D= E . 9 -110 -100 -10 0 0 0
5 5 NS 17 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -2
5 6 NS 17 3S+1 N . 10 170 100 70 2 2 3
5 7 EW 16 4S= S . 10 -620 -660 40 1 1 3
5 8 EW 16 4HX-2 E . 8 -300 -100 -200 -5 -5 -6
5 9 NS 15 6NT-1 N . 11 -50 460 -510 -11 -11 -11 Yes
5 10 NS 15 3D-1 W . 8 100 10 90 3 3 3
5 11 NS 14 4H+1 W . 11 -450 -290 -160 -4 -4 -4
5 12 NS 14 4S-1 W . 9 50 10 40 1 1 1
5 13 NS 13 5S-1 S . 10 -100 -20 -80 -2 -2 -2
5 14 NS 13 2S+2 N . 10 170 310 -140 -4 -4 -3
5 15 NS 12 2S+1 N . 9 140 0 140 4 4 4
5 16 NS 12 3H+1 E . 10 -170 -150 -20 -1 -1 0
5 17 NS 11 3NT+3 E . 12 -490 -620 130 4 4 2
5 18 NS 11 1H+2 W . 9 -140 -120 -20 -1 -1 -1
5 19 NS 10 3NT= S . 9 400 300 100 3 3 3
5 20 NS 10 4S= E . 10 -620 50 -670 -12 -12 -12 Yes
5 21 NS 2 3D= E . 9 -110 -120 10 0 0 -1
5 22 NS 2 4H-4 N . 6 -200 -60 -140 -4 -4 -4


Detail for Pair: Sheila Vincent & Nick Hagan

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
6 1 NS 2 3NT+1 N . 10 430 580 -150 -4 -4 -4
6 2 NS 2 3NT-2 S . 7 -200 40 -240 -6 -6 -7 Yes
6 5 NS 19 3S= S . 9 140 0 140 4 4 4
6 6 NS 19 3SX-2 N . 7 -300 100 -400 -9 -9 -9 Yes
6 7 NS 18 4S= S . 10 620 660 -40 -1 -1 -3 Yes
6 8 NS 18 3H-2 E . 7 100 100 0 0 0 0
6 9 EW 17 3NT+2 N . 11 -460 -460 0 0 0 0
6 10 EW 17 2H= S . 8 -110 -10 -100 -3 -3 -3
6 11 NS 16 4H= W . 10 -420 -290 -130 -4 -4 -4
6 12 NS 16 3H-1 N . 8 -100 10 -110 -3 -3 -3
6 13 NS 15 3NT+2 N . 11 660 -20 680 12 12 12 Yes
6 14 NS 15 3S+1 N . 10 170 310 -140 -4 -4 -3
6 15 NS 14 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -3 Yes
6 16 NS 14 3S-1 N . 8 -50 -150 100 3 3 3
6 17 NS 13 4H+2 E . 12 -480 -620 140 4 4 3
6 18 NS 13 1H+3 W . 10 -170 -120 -50 -2 -2 -2 Yes
6 19 NS 12 3NT-4 S . 5 -200 300 -500 -11 -11 -10 Yes
6 20 NS 12 5S-2 E . 9 200 50 150 4 4 4
6 21 NS 11 3D= E . 9 -110 -120 10 0 0 -1
6 22 NS 11 4H-2 N . 8 -100 -60 -40 -1 -1 -2
6 23 NS 10 3H+1 W . 10 -170 -230 60 2 2 2
6 24 NS 10 2C+1 S . 9 110 110 0 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Roger Bacon & Len Williams

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
7 1 NS 12 6D+1 N . 13 940 580 360 8 8 8 Yes
7 2 NS 12 3S= N . 9 140 40 100 3 3 2
7 3 NS 11 4S= S . 10 420 270 150 4 4 4 Yes
7 4 NS 11 2NT-1 E . 7 100 -100 200 5 5 6 Yes
7 5 NS 10 2S= N . 8 110 0 110 3 3 3
7 6 NS 10 3S+1 N . 10 170 100 70 2 2 3
7 7 NS 2 4S+1 S . 11 650 660 -10 0 0 -2
7 8 NS 2 4HX-2 E . 8 300 100 200 5 5 6 Yes
7 11 NS 19 4H+2 W . 12 -480 -290 -190 -5 -5 -6 Yes
7 12 NS 19 2H= N . 8 110 10 100 3 3 3 Yes
7 13 EW 18 6NT-1 N . 11 100 20 80 2 2 2
7 14 EW 18 4S= N . 10 -420 -310 -110 -3 -3 -4
7 15 NS 17 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -3
7 16 NS 17 4H= E . 10 -620 -150 -470 -10 -10 -10 Yes
7 17 NS 16 6HX-1 E . 11 100 -620 720 12 12 12 Yes
7 18 NS 16 1H+2 W . 9 -140 -120 -20 -1 -1 -1
7 19 NS 15 3NT+2 S . 11 460 300 160 4 4 5 Yes
7 20 NS 15 3NT+1 S . 10 630 50 580 11 11 11 Yes
7 21 NS 14 3S-1 S . 8 -100 -120 20 1 1 0
7 22 NS 14 4SX-3 E . 7 800 -60 860 13 13 14 Yes
7 23 NS 13 3H+1 W . 10 -170 -230 60 2 2 2
7 24 NS 13 2S+1 S . 9 140 110 30 1 1 1


Detail for Pair: Catriona Lovett & Mike Harbour

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
8 1 NS 14 5D+1 N . 12 420 580 -160 -4 -4 -4 Yes
8 2 NS 14 4S+1 S . 11 650 40 610 12 12 12 Yes
8 3 NS 13 4S-1 S . 9 -50 270 -320 -8 -8 -7
8 4 NS 13 2D= E . 8 -90 -100 10 0 0 0
8 5 NS 12 3S= N . 9 140 0 140 4 4 4 Yes
8 6 NS 12 2S+2 N . 10 170 100 70 2 2 3
8 7 NS 11 4S+1 S . 11 650 660 -10 0 0 -2
8 8 NS 11 4D-1 N . 9 -50 100 -150 -4 -4 -4
8 9 NS 10 3NT+2 S . 11 460 460 0 0 0 0
8 10 NS 10 4H-2 S . 8 -200 10 -210 -5 -5 -5
8 11 NS 2 4C= S . 10 130 -290 420 9 9 9 Yes
8 12 NS 2 2H= N . 8 110 10 100 3 3 3
8 15 EW 19 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 3
8 16 EW 19 4H= W . 10 620 150 470 10 10 10
8 17 NS 18 6H= E . 12 -980 -620 -360 -8 -8 -8
8 18 NS 18 4H-1 W . 9 50 -120 170 5 5 5 Yes
8 19 NS 17 3NT+1 S . 10 430 300 130 4 4 4
8 20 NS 17 5D-1 N . 10 -100 50 -150 -4 -4 -3
8 21 NS 16 3D+1 E . 10 -130 -120 -10 0 0 -2
8 22 NS 16 4H-3 N . 7 -150 -60 -90 -3 -3 -3
8 23 NS 15 3H-1 W . 8 100 -230 330 8 8 8 Yes
8 24 NS 15 1NT-2 E . 5 100 110 -10 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Margaret Rastin & Roger Tattersfield

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
9 1 NS 16 3NT+3 N . 12 490 580 -90 -3 -3 -2
9 2 NS 16 1S+3 S . 10 170 40 130 4 4 3
9 3 NS 15 4S-1 S . 9 -50 270 -320 -8 -8 -7 Yes
9 4 NS 15 2D= E . 8 -90 -100 10 0 0 0
9 5 NS 14 3S= N . 9 140 0 140 4 4 4
9 6 NS 14 3S+1 N . 10 170 100 70 2 2 3 Yes
9 7 NS 13 4S+2 N . 12 680 660 20 1 1 -1
9 8 NS 13 4D-1 N . 9 -50 100 -150 -4 -4 -4
9 9 NS 12 4NT+2 N . 12 490 460 30 1 1 1
9 10 NS 12 2H-1 S . 7 -100 10 -110 -3 -3 -3
9 11 NS 11 5CX-1 S . 10 -100 -290 190 5 5 4
9 12 NS 11 4H-2 N . 8 -200 10 -210 -5 -5 -5 Yes
9 13 NS 10 6NT-2 N . 10 -200 -20 -180 -5 -5 -5
9 14 NS 10 4S= S . 10 420 310 110 3 3 4
9 15 NS 2 2S+2 N . 10 170 0 170 5 5 5 Yes
9 16 NS 2 4S-2 N . 8 -100 -150 50 2 2 2
9 19 NS 19 3NT= S . 9 400 300 100 3 3 3
9 20 NS 19 5DX-1 N . 10 -200 50 -250 -6 -6 -5
9 21 NS 18 5DX-2 E . 9 300 -120 420 9 9 10 Yes
9 22 NS 18 4HX-2 N . 8 -300 -60 -240 -6 -6 -7 Yes
9 23 NS 17 3S-2 S . 7 -200 -230 30 1 1 1
9 24 NS 17 1NT-2 E . 5 100 110 -10 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Chris Megahey & Alaric Cundy

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
10 1 NS 13 6D= N . 12 920 580 340 8 8 8
10 2 NS 13 4S-1 S . 9 -100 40 -140 -4 -4 -4
10 3 EW 1 4S= S . 10 -420 -270 -150 -4 -4 -4
10 4 EW 1 2D+1 E . 9 110 100 10 0 0 0
10 5 EW 7 2S= N . 8 -110 0 -110 -3 -3 -3
10 6 EW 7 3S+1 N . 10 -170 -100 -70 -2 -2 -3
10 7 EW 19 4H+2 N . 12 -680 -660 -20 -1 -1 1
10 8 EW 19 3H-2 E . 7 -100 -100 0 0 0 0
10 9 EW 8 3NT+2 S . 11 -460 -460 0 0 0 0
10 10 EW 8 4H-2 S . 8 200 -10 210 5 5 5
10 11 EW 3 5CX-1 S . 10 100 290 -190 -5 -5 -4
10 12 EW 3 3S-2 W . 7 -100 -10 -90 -3 -3 -3
10 13 EW 9 6NT-2 N . 10 200 20 180 5 5 5
10 14 EW 9 4S= S . 10 -420 -310 -110 -3 -3 -4
10 15 EW 4 2H= N . 8 -110 0 -110 -3 -3 -3
10 16 EW 4 4SX-1 N . 9 100 150 -50 -2 -2 -2
10 17 EW 12 6HX= W . 12 1210 620 590 11 11 11 Yes
10 18 EW 12 1H+3 W . 10 170 120 50 2 2 2
10 19 EW 5 3NT= S . 9 -400 -300 -100 -3 -3 -3
10 20 EW 5 4S= E . 10 620 -50 670 12 12 12 Yes
10 23 EW 6 3H+1 W . 10 170 230 -60 -2 -2 -2
10 24 EW 6 2C+1 S . 9 -110 -110 0 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Phil Hitchins & Phil Tucker

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
11 1 EW 1 5D+1 N . 12 -420 -580 160 4 4 4
11 2 EW 1 4H-2 S . 8 200 -40 240 6 6 7
11 3 EW 7 4S= S . 10 -420 -270 -150 -4 -4 -4 Yes
11 4 EW 7 2NT-1 E . 7 -100 100 -200 -5 -5 -6 Yes
11 7 EW 8 4S+1 S . 11 -650 -660 10 0 0 2
11 8 EW 8 4D-1 N . 9 50 -100 150 4 4 4
11 9 EW 3 3NT+3 N . 12 -490 -460 -30 -1 -1 -1
11 10 EW 3 2H+1 S . 9 -140 -10 -130 -4 -4 -4
11 11 EW 9 5CX-1 S . 10 100 290 -190 -5 -5 -4
11 12 EW 9 4H-2 N . 8 200 -10 210 5 5 5 Yes
11 13 EW 4 6NT-1 S . 11 100 20 80 2 2 2
11 14 EW 4 4S-1 N . 9 50 -310 360 8 8 8 Yes
11 15 EW 13 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 3
11 16 EW 13 3H= E . 9 140 150 -10 0 0 0
11 17 EW 5 3NT+3 E . 12 490 620 -130 -4 -4 -2
11 18 EW 5 1H+2 W . 9 140 120 20 1 1 1
11 19 NS 2 3NT= S . 9 400 300 100 3 3 3
11 20 NS 2 5D-1 N . 10 -100 50 -150 -4 -4 -3
11 21 EW 6 3D= E . 9 110 120 -10 0 0 1
11 22 EW 6 4H-2 N . 8 100 60 40 1 1 2
11 23 NS 14 4SX-4 S . 6 -1100 -230 -870 -13 -13 -14 Yes
11 24 NS 14 2S-2 S . 6 -100 110 -210 -5 -5 -6 Yes


Detail for Pair: Lionel Thacker & James Murray

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
12 1 EW 7 6D+1 N . 13 -940 -580 -360 -8 -8 -8 Yes
12 2 EW 7 3S= N . 9 -140 -40 -100 -3 -3 -2
12 3 EW 2 4S-1 S . 9 50 -270 320 8 8 7
12 4 EW 2 2NT-4 N . 4 400 100 300 7 7 8 Yes
12 5 EW 8 3S= N . 9 -140 0 -140 -4 -4 -4 Yes
12 6 EW 8 2S+2 N . 10 -170 -100 -70 -2 -2 -3
12 7 EW 3 4S+2 N . 12 -680 -660 -20 -1 -1 1
12 8 EW 3 3C+1 S . 10 -130 -100 -30 -1 -1 -1
12 9 EW 9 4NT+2 N . 12 -490 -460 -30 -1 -1 -1
12 10 EW 9 2H-1 S . 7 100 -10 110 3 3 3
12 11 EW 4 4H= W . 10 420 290 130 4 4 4
12 12 EW 4 4H-1 N . 9 100 -10 110 3 3 3
12 13 EW 14 6NT-2 N . 10 200 20 180 5 5 5 Yes
12 14 EW 14 4S= S . 10 -420 -310 -110 -3 -3 -4
12 15 EW 5 2S+1 N . 9 -140 0 -140 -4 -4 -4
12 16 EW 5 3H+1 E . 10 170 150 20 1 1 0
12 17 NS 10 6HX= W . 12 -1210 -620 -590 -11 -11 -11 Yes
12 18 NS 10 1H+3 W . 10 -170 -120 -50 -2 -2 -2
12 19 EW 6 3NT-4 S . 5 200 -300 500 11 11 10 Yes
12 20 EW 6 5S-2 E . 9 -200 -50 -150 -4 -4 -4
12 21 NS 15 3D= E . 9 -110 -120 10 0 0 -1
12 22 NS 15 4H-3 N . 7 -150 -60 -90 -3 -3 -3
12 23 NS 1 3H= W . 9 -140 -230 90 3 3 3
12 24 NS 1 3H= N . 9 140 110 30 1 1 1


Detail for Pair: Simon Moorman & Peter Oake

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
13 1 EW 10 6D= N . 12 -920 -580 -340 -8 -8 -8
13 2 EW 10 4S-1 S . 9 100 -40 140 4 4 4
13 3 EW 8 4S-1 S . 9 50 -270 320 8 8 7
13 4 EW 8 2D= E . 8 90 100 -10 0 0 0
13 5 EW 3 3S-1 S . 8 100 0 100 3 3 2
13 6 EW 3 1NT= W . 7 90 -100 190 5 5 4
13 7 EW 9 4S+2 N . 12 -680 -660 -20 -1 -1 1
13 8 EW 9 4D-1 N . 9 50 -100 150 4 4 4
13 9 EW 4 3NT+2 N . 11 -460 -460 0 0 0 0
13 10 EW 4 4H-2 S . 8 200 -10 210 5 5 5 Yes
13 11 EW 15 5H= W . 11 450 290 160 4 4 4
13 12 EW 15 2D-2 W . 6 -100 -10 -90 -3 -3 -3
13 13 EW 5 5S-1 S . 10 100 20 80 2 2 2
13 14 EW 5 2S+2 N . 10 -170 -310 140 4 4 3
13 15 NS 11 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -3
13 16 NS 11 3H= E . 9 -140 -150 10 0 0 0
13 17 EW 6 4H+2 E . 12 480 620 -140 -4 -4 -3
13 18 EW 6 1H+3 W . 10 170 120 50 2 2 2 Yes
13 19 NS 16 3NT+1 S . 10 430 300 130 4 4 4
13 20 NS 16 3NT= S . 9 600 50 550 11 11 10
13 21 NS 1 3D+1 E . 10 -130 -120 -10 0 0 -2
13 22 NS 1 3S-1 E . 8 100 -60 160 4 4 3
13 23 EW 7 3H+1 W . 10 170 230 -60 -2 -2 -2
13 24 EW 7 2S+1 S . 9 -140 -110 -30 -1 -1 -1


Detail for Pair: Les Curtis & David Piper

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
14 1 EW 8 5D+1 N . 12 -420 -580 160 4 4 4 Yes
14 2 EW 8 4S+1 S . 11 -650 -40 -610 -12 -12 -12 Yes
14 3 NS 3 4S= S . 10 420 270 150 4 4 4
14 4 NS 3 2D= E . 8 -90 -100 10 0 0 0
14 5 EW 9 3S= N . 9 -140 0 -140 -4 -4 -4
14 6 EW 9 3S+1 N . 10 -170 -100 -70 -2 -2 -3 Yes
14 7 EW 4 6S= S . 12 -1430 -660 -770 -13 -13 -13 Yes
14 8 EW 4 5D-3 N . 8 150 -100 250 6 6 6 Yes
14 9 EW 16 3NT+1 N . 10 -430 -460 30 1 1 1
14 10 EW 16 3D-1 W . 8 -100 -10 -90 -3 -3 -3
14 11 EW 5 4H+1 W . 11 450 290 160 4 4 4
14 12 EW 5 4S-1 W . 9 -50 -10 -40 -1 -1 -1
14 13 NS 12 6NT-2 N . 10 -200 -20 -180 -5 -5 -5 Yes
14 14 NS 12 4S= S . 10 420 310 110 3 3 4
14 15 EW 6 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 3 Yes
14 16 EW 6 3S-1 N . 8 50 150 -100 -3 -3 -3
14 17 NS 17 4S= W . 10 -420 -620 200 5 5 4
14 18 NS 17 3H= W . 9 -140 -120 -20 -1 -1 -1
14 19 EW 1 3C= S . 9 -110 -300 190 5 5 4
14 20 EW 1 3S+1 E . 10 170 -50 220 6 6 4
14 21 EW 7 3S-1 S . 8 100 120 -20 -1 -1 0
14 22 EW 7 4SX-3 E . 7 -800 60 -860 -13 -13 -14 Yes
14 23 EW 11 4SX-4 S . 6 1100 230 870 13 13 14 Yes
14 24 EW 11 2S-2 S . 6 100 -110 210 5 5 6 Yes


Detail for Pair: Pamela Kite & Liz Williams

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
15 1 NS 3 6D= N . 12 920 580 340 8 8 8
15 2 NS 3 2S+2 S . 10 170 40 130 4 4 3
15 3 EW 9 4S-1 S . 9 50 -270 320 8 8 7 Yes
15 4 EW 9 2D= E . 8 90 100 -10 0 0 0
15 5 NS 4 4S-2 N . 8 -200 0 -200 -5 -5 -5 Yes
15 6 NS 4 3S-1 N . 8 -50 100 -150 -4 -4 -4
15 7 EW 17 4S+1 S . 11 -650 -660 10 0 0 2
15 8 EW 17 3H-3 E . 6 -150 -100 -50 -2 -2 -2
15 9 EW 5 6NT-1 N . 11 50 -460 510 11 11 11 Yes
15 10 EW 5 3D-1 W . 8 -100 -10 -90 -3 -3 -3
15 11 NS 13 5H= W . 11 -450 -290 -160 -4 -4 -4
15 12 NS 13 2D-2 W . 6 100 10 90 3 3 3
15 13 EW 6 3NT+2 N . 11 -660 20 -680 -12 -12 -12 Yes
15 14 EW 6 3S+1 N . 10 -170 -310 140 4 4 3
15 15 NS 18 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -3
15 16 NS 18 3S= N . 9 140 -150 290 7 7 7 Yes
15 17 EW 1 6H= E . 12 980 620 360 8 8 8
15 18 EW 1 2H+1 W . 9 140 120 20 1 1 1
15 19 EW 7 3NT+2 S . 11 -460 -300 -160 -4 -4 -5 Yes
15 20 EW 7 3NT+1 S . 10 -630 -50 -580 -11 -11 -11 Yes
15 21 EW 12 3D= E . 9 110 120 -10 0 0 1
15 22 EW 12 4H-3 N . 7 150 60 90 3 3 3
15 23 EW 8 3H-1 W . 8 -100 230 -330 -8 -8 -8 Yes
15 24 EW 8 1NT-2 E . 5 -100 -110 10 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Julie Lake & Gillian Burrows

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
16 1 EW 9 3NT+3 N . 12 -490 -580 90 3 3 2
16 2 EW 9 1S+3 S . 10 -170 -40 -130 -4 -4 -3
16 3 NS 4 4D-3 E . 7 300 270 30 1 1 1
16 4 NS 4 2D= E . 8 -90 -100 10 0 0 0
16 5 EW 18 4S-1 S . 9 100 0 100 3 3 2
16 6 EW 18 3S+1 N . 10 -170 -100 -70 -2 -2 -3
16 7 NS 5 4S= S . 10 620 660 -40 -1 -1 -3
16 8 NS 5 4HX-2 E . 8 300 100 200 5 5 6
16 9 NS 14 3NT+1 N . 10 430 460 -30 -1 -1 -1
16 10 NS 14 3D-1 W . 8 100 10 90 3 3 3
16 11 EW 6 4H= W . 10 420 290 130 4 4 4
16 12 EW 6 3H-1 N . 8 100 -10 110 3 3 3
16 13 NS 19 4NT= N . 10 630 -20 650 12 12 11
16 14 NS 19 3S= S . 9 140 310 -170 -5 -5 -4
16 15 EW 1 3S= N . 9 -140 0 -140 -4 -4 -4
16 16 EW 1 3H-1 E . 8 -100 150 -250 -6 -6 -6
16 17 EW 7 6HX-1 E . 11 -100 620 -720 -12 -12 -12 Yes
16 18 EW 7 1H+2 W . 9 140 120 20 1 1 1
16 19 EW 13 3NT+1 S . 10 -430 -300 -130 -4 -4 -4
16 20 EW 13 3NT= S . 9 -600 -50 -550 -11 -11 -10
16 21 EW 8 3D+1 E . 10 130 120 10 0 0 2
16 22 EW 8 4H-3 N . 7 150 60 90 3 3 3
16 23 EW 3 3H= W . 9 140 230 -90 -3 -3 -3
16 24 EW 3 1NT-2 E . 5 -100 -110 10 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Dorothy Cundy & Chris Rastin

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
17 1 EW 4 3NT+1 N . 10 -430 -580 150 4 4 4
17 2 EW 4 4S-1 S . 9 100 -40 140 4 4 4
17 3 EW 19 4S= S . 10 -420 -270 -150 -4 -4 -4
17 4 EW 19 2NT-1 N . 7 100 100 0 0 0 0
17 5 EW 5 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 2
17 6 EW 5 3S+1 N . 10 -170 -100 -70 -2 -2 -3
17 7 NS 15 4S+1 S . 11 650 660 -10 0 0 -2
17 8 NS 15 3H-3 E . 6 150 100 50 2 2 2
17 9 NS 6 3NT+2 N . 11 460 460 0 0 0 0
17 10 NS 6 2H= S . 8 110 10 100 3 3 3
17 13 EW 1 6NT-1 N . 11 100 20 80 2 2 2
17 14 EW 1 4S= N . 10 -420 -310 -110 -3 -3 -4
17 15 EW 7 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 3
17 16 EW 7 4H= E . 10 620 150 470 10 10 10 Yes
17 17 EW 14 4S= W . 10 420 620 -200 -5 -5 -4
17 18 EW 14 3H= W . 9 140 120 20 1 1 1
17 19 EW 8 3NT+1 S . 10 -430 -300 -130 -4 -4 -4
17 20 EW 8 5D-1 N . 10 100 -50 150 4 4 3
17 21 EW 3 3D+2 W . 11 150 120 30 1 1 2 Yes
17 22 EW 3 4S-3 E . 7 -300 60 -360 -8 -8 -7
17 23 EW 9 3S-2 S . 7 200 230 -30 -1 -1 -1
17 24 EW 9 1NT-2 E . 5 -100 -110 10 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: David Tennet & Theo Todman

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
18 3 EW 5 4S= S . 10 -420 -270 -150 -4 -4 -4
18 4 EW 5 3D= E . 9 110 100 10 0 0 0
18 5 NS 16 4S-1 S . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -2
18 6 NS 16 3S+1 N . 10 170 100 70 2 2 3
18 7 EW 6 4S= S . 10 -620 -660 40 1 1 3 Yes
18 8 EW 6 3H-2 E . 7 -100 -100 0 0 0 0
18 9 NS 2 3NT+2 S . 11 460 460 0 0 0 0
18 10 NS 2 2H+1 N . 9 140 10 130 4 4 4 Yes
18 11 EW 1 5CX-1 S . 10 100 290 -190 -5 -5 -4
18 12 EW 1 3C-1 S . 8 100 -10 110 3 3 3
18 13 NS 7 6NT-1 N . 11 -100 -20 -80 -2 -2 -2
18 14 NS 7 4S= N . 10 420 310 110 3 3 4
18 15 EW 15 4S-1 N . 9 100 0 100 3 3 3
18 16 EW 15 3S= N . 9 -140 150 -290 -7 -7 -7 Yes
18 17 EW 8 6H= E . 12 980 620 360 8 8 8
18 18 EW 8 4H-1 W . 9 -50 120 -170 -5 -5 -5 Yes
18 19 EW 3 5C-1 S . 10 50 -300 350 8 8 8
18 20 EW 3 4D= N . 10 -130 -50 -80 -2 -2 -2
18 21 EW 9 5DX-2 E . 9 -300 120 -420 -9 -9 -10 Yes
18 22 EW 9 4HX-2 N . 8 300 60 240 6 6 7 Yes
18 23 EW 4 4H= E . 10 620 230 390 9 9 8
18 24 EW 4 1S+1 S . 8 -110 -110 0 0 0 0


Detail for Pair: Derek Smith & Peter Goodey

Pair Board Sat Opponents Contract By Lead Tricks Score Datum Butler Score Butler IMPs Scored IMPs X-IMPs Outlier?
19 1 EW 5 3NT+1 N . 10 -430 -580 150 4 4 4
19 2 EW 5 2S+2 S . 10 -170 -40 -130 -4 -4 -3
19 3 NS 17 4S= S . 10 420 270 150 4 4 4
19 4 NS 17 2NT-1 N . 7 -100 -100 0 0 0 0
19 5 EW 6 3S= S . 9 -140 0 -140 -4 -4 -4
19 6 EW 6 3SX-2 N . 7 300 -100 400 9 9 9 Yes
19 7 NS 10 4H+2 N . 12 680 660 20 1 1 -1
19 8 NS 10 3H-2 E . 7 100 100 0 0 0 0
19 9 EW 1 6NT= N . 12 -990 -460 -530 -11 -11 -11 Yes
19 10 EW 1 2H-1 S . 7 100 -10 110 3 3 3
19 11 EW 7 4H+2 W . 12 480 290 190 5 5 6 Yes
19 12 EW 7 2H= N . 8 -110 -10 -100 -3 -3 -3 Yes
19 13 EW 16 4NT= N . 10 -630 20 -650 -12 -12 -11
19 14 EW 16 3S= S . 9 -140 -310 170 5 5 4
19 15 NS 8 4S-1 N . 9 -100 0 -100 -3 -3 -3
19 16 NS 8 4H= W . 10 -620 -150 -470 -10 -10 -10
19 17 EW 3 4H+2 E . 12 480 620 -140 -4 -4 -3
19 18 EW 3 2H+2 W . 10 170 120 50 2 2 2
19 19 EW 9 3NT= S . 9 -400 -300 -100 -3 -3 -3
19 20 EW 9 5DX-1 N . 10 200 -50 250 6 6 5
19 21 EW 4 3D+2 W . 11 150 120 30 1 1 2
19 22 EW 4 4C-4 S . 6 200 60 140 4 4 4
19 23 EW 2 3H+1 W . 10 170 230 -60 -2 -2 -2
19 24 EW 2 2H+3 N . 11 -200 -110 -90 -3 -3 -3 Yes

File output at 21/04/2015 19:07:00 by Theo Todman