Theo Todman's Web Page - Notes Pages


Christian Tractatus

(Text as at 12/08/2007 10:17:46)


This is the negative version of the Golden Rule ("do to others as you would have them do to you"). My objections to the general application of the Golden Rule are two-fold:-

  1. Firstly, the Golden Rule presupposes that all peoples' aims and desires are identical (or at least similar). In fact, though we have observed areas of commonality, what I may want in any particular situation may not be what you would want. It is possible to ameliorate the Rule by modifying a rephrased version from "do to another as you would have him do to you if you were in his position" to "do to another as you would have him do to you if you were him". Unfortunately, this presupposes an intimate knowledge of other people's desires which may, in practice, be difficult to obtain.
  2. Secondly, the Golden Rule only makes sense (however virtuously altruistic it may be) in a theocratic rewards-based world view. It is too onerous for consistent non-theocratic application.




Note last updated Reference for this Topic Parent Topic
12/08/2007 10:17:46 506 (Non-theistic Ethics - Reflexivity - Golden Rule) Non-theistic Ethics - Reflexivity



Summary of Note Links to this Page

Non-theistic Ethics - Reflexivity        

To access information, click on one of the links in the table above.




Text Colour Conventions

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2017




© Theo Todman, June 2007 - September 2017.Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com.File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this PageReturn to Theo Todman's Philosophy PageReturn to Theo Todman's Home Page