Theo Todman's Web Page - Notes Pages

Christian Tractatus

(Text as at 12/08/2007 10:17:46)

I take it that an action is right if it is likely to increase the weighted sum of good available to those (including myself, the agent) likely to be affected by it. We can thereby define the set of right actions (in any context) if we can define what we count as being good.

  1. From the above it will be seen that an action can be right without being the best available, ie. without it being intended to produce the maximum good from the options available.
  2. My use of the term good here does not have the moral overtones of "praiseworthy". Actions are right, not good. States of affairs are good (or bad). The term good is used here in the sense of "a good thing", rather than "morally approved".
  3. The concept of the weighted sum of the good is discussed in a later section.

Note last updated Reference for this Topic Parent Topic
12/08/2007 10:17:46 507 (Non-theistic Ethics - Maximisation) Non-theistic Ethics

Summary of Note Links to this Page

Non-theistic Ethics - Categorisation        

To access information, click on one of the links in the table above.

Text Colour Conventions

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019

© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Feb 2019.Please address any comments on this page to output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this PageReturn to Theo Todman's Philosophy PageReturn to Theo Todman's Home Page