(Text as at 20/08/2007 17:51:22)
(For earlier versions of this Note, see the table at the end)
Religion a tool of the ruling class?
I strongly disagree with this contention, at least at one level. Religions certainly weren’t devised by the ruling class (though there have been wealthy religious reformers – eg. Buddha, Francis of Assisi – but they have tended to divest themselves of their wealth and political power in the course of their religious reforms), and they often started off as movements with highly subversive political repercussions.
But no doubt for them to co-exist with the state, an accommodation has had to be reached, with the risk that the religious elite can be manipulated into controlling the populace for the benefit of the political elite. And in a theocracy, where the political and religious elites coincide, there’s the danger of mixed motives on the part of those in authority.
That said, and popular though this idea is in atheist circles, I think it’s a mistake to consider religion as merely a means of political control. In what sense is this true of the US, one of the world’s most religiously-inclined countries?
|16/08/2007 14:44:10||24||Religion as State-Control|
|Note last updated||Reference for this Topic||Parent Topic|
|20/08/2007 17:51:22||525 (Religion as State-Control)||Simon - T1S1|
|Simon - T1S1|
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above.
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - September 2017.||Please address any comments on this page to email@example.com.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|