(Text as at 22/08/2007 00:15:50)
(For earlier versions of this Note, see the table at the end)
Is belief in a god justified because it’s the only freely available antidote to the natural ocean of [Darwinian] suffering?
What do you mean by “justified”? If you mean “psychologically intelligible”, maybe so. However, nothing can be intellectually justified simply because it is comforting. And it has to be belief in a certain kind of god. The Incas believed in a vengeful god that resented the life of his creation. I’ve read somewhere that an Inca, after some famous victory, contemplated suicide as this was an opportune moment to return his life to the one who gave it. I can’t remember the rationale behind all this. A priori, there’s no reason why the god who actually exists isn’t of this sort (and maybe even a posteriori, given the state of the world).
|21/08/2007 09:44:38||123||Justification of Religious Belief|
|16/08/2007 14:44:10||24||Justification of Religious Belief|
|Note last updated||Reference for this Topic||Parent Topic|
|22/08/2007 00:15:50||534 (Justification of Religious Belief)||Simon - T1S1|
|Simon - T1S1|
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above.
|© Theo Todman, June 2007 - September 2017.||Please address any comments on this page to firstname.lastname@example.org.||File output: |
Website Maintenance Dashboard
|Return to Top of this Page||Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page||Return to Theo Todman's Home Page|